ISBN: 1231046228

[EAN: 9781231046227], Neubuch, [PU: RareBooksClub], NEW JERSEY. SUPREME COURT,SUBJECTS, This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 256 pages. Dimensions: 9.7in. x 7.4in. x 0.5in.This hist… More...

[EAN: 9781231046227], Neubuch, [PU: RareBooksClub], NEW JERSEY. SUPREME COURT,SUBJECTS, This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 256 pages. Dimensions: 9.7in. x 7.4in. x 0.5in.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1917 Excerpt: . . . the aid of the court. It would be quite impracticable for the courts to undertake to compel men to receive into their social relationships one who was personally disagreeable whether for a good or a bad reason. Property rights the courts can deal with; rights in an incorporated company are of that character, and the right of membership is ordinarily assignable. Voluntary associations are quite different. The courts can deal with property rights of such associations, if there are an-y, while they cannot by a mandatory writ intrude one mans companionship on another. The attempt to do so would be unavailing as it would lead only to the disintegration of the association. We do not mean to deny the present relators right to recover damages if his right to labor has been illegally interfered with. Brennan v. United Hatters, 73 N. J. L. 729. All we now decide is that mandamus is not a proper remedy. The rule is discharged, with costs. IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR MANDAMUS ON BOARD OF ELECTION, FOURTEENTH DISTRICT, TWELFTH WARD OF JERSEY CITY. Argued November 27, 1916--Decided December 1, 1916. Under the provisions of the act regulating elections, the board of county canvassers ordinarily is required to canvass the returns as laid before them by the various local boards, but where a doubt appears from the return as to its correctness, it is proper to have the local board certify what are the correct figures. Before Justices SWAYZE and Kanrson. For the relator, George J. M cEwan. Opposed, Gilbert Collins. The opinion of the court was delivered by SWAYZE, J. Ordinarily we think the board of countv canvassers would be required to canvass the returns laid before them, and could not seek for evidence elsewhere. State, Gledhill v. The Governor, 25. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN.<

2012, ISBN: 1231046228

[EAN: 9781231046227], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing … More...

[EAN: 9781231046227], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1917 Excerpt: . the aid of the court. It would be quite impracticable for the courts to undertake to compel men to receive into their social relationships one who was personally disagreeable whether for a good or a bad reason. Property rights the courts can deal with; rights in an incorporated company are of that character, and the right of membership is ordinarily assignable. Voluntary associations are quite different. The courts can deal with property rights of such associations, if there are an-y, while they cannot by a mandatory writ intrude one man s companionship on another. The attempt to do so would be unavailing as it would lead only to the disintegration of the association. We do not mean to deny the present relator s right to recover damages if his right to labor has been illegally interfered with. Brennan v. United Hatters, 73 N. J. L. 729. All we now decide is that mandamus is not a proper remedy. The rule is discharged, with costs. IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR MANDAMUS ON BOARD OF ELECTION, FOURTEENTH DISTRICT, TWELFTH WARD OF JERSEY CITY. Argued November 27, 1916--Decided December 1, 1916. Under the provisions of the act regulating elections, the board of county canvassers ordinarily is required to canvass the returns as laid before them by the various local boards, but where a doubt appears from the return as to its correctness, it is proper to have the local board certify what are the correct figures. Before Justices SWAYZE and Kanrson. For the relator, George J. M cE wan. Opposed, Gilbert Collins. The opinion of the court was delivered by SWAYZE, J. Ordinarily we think the board of cou nt v canvassers would be required to canvass the returns laid before them, and could not seek for evidence elsewhere. State, Gledhill v. The Governor, 25.<