2012, ISBN: 1236303911

[EAN: 9781236303912], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers c… More...

[EAN: 9781236303912], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1908 Excerpt: .Court has held these acts to be constitutional. Hoboken v. O'Neill, 44 Vroom 189. In the respect indicated in the reason filed in the Supreme Court, the objection is unavailable, for we hold that freeholders and taxpayers are not barred from an inquiry into the truth of an affidavit on which an investigation is ordered. The result is that the judgment must be affirmed. For affirmance--The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, BociERT, Vredenrurgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 14. For reversal--None. Smith v. Atlantic City Railroad Co. H N. J. L. JOHN SMITH, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ATLANTIC CITY. RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR. JAMES SMITH, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ATLANTIC CITY RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR. Argued June 29, 1906--Decided March 4, 1907. 1. While an exception to a single legal proposition, contained in a charge to the jury, need not point out the grounds on which it is taken, unless the trial judge requires, it must bring to the mind of the trial judge the matter excepted to, either by a recital of the language used or of its very substance. 2. An exception to the "court's charge to the jury on the question of damages" is insufficient to bring into review any question as to the propriety of the charge on that subject. On error to the Supreme Court. For the plaintiff in error, J. Willard Morgan and Clarence L. Cole. For the defendants in error, John W. Wcscott. The opinion of the court was delivered by Magie, Chancellor. These writs of error bring up for review judgments in the Supreme Court, affirming judgments of the Camden County Circuit Court upon verdicts of a jury. The actions were brought to recover damages resulting from a collision between a train of the plaintiff in error.<