ISBN: 9783640176670

In our present work we want to enter into the question how the agreement between reported and implicit affects will vary in different situation of freedom restriction, in different orders… More...

In our present work we want to enter into the question how the agreement between reported and implicit affects will vary in different situation of freedom restriction, in different orders of test-methods and we ask how Eysencks personality construct Extraversion has an influence on the dissociation between reported and implicit affects. We also try to evaluate, if people report higher reactance, when they have experienced legitimate or illegitimate created reactance instead of experiences in a neutral situation. People in the legitimate situation didn`t experience more explicit reactance than people in the illegitimate situations. People, who have experienced legitimate or illegitimate created reactance reported about higher reactance than people in the neutral situation. Compared with the legitimate situation, in one case we could observe that the agreement between reported and implicit affects were higher, when the reactance was created illegitimate. In some cases the order of the test-instrument influenced the results. The personality dimension extraversion had no great impact on the agreement between reported and implicit affects. [...] The agreement between explicit and implicit affects in legitimate and illegitimate situations: In our present work we want to enter into the question how the agreement between reported and implicit affects will vary in different situation of freedom restriction, in different orders of test-methods and we ask how Eysencks personality construct Extraversion has an influence on the dissociation between reported and implicit affects. We also try to evaluate, if people report higher reactance, when they have experienced legitimate or illegitimate created reactance instead of experiences in a neutral situation. People in the legitimate situation didn`t experience more explicit reactance than people in the illegitimate situations. People, who have experienced legitimate or illegitimate created reactance reported about higher reactance than people in the neutral situation. Compared with the legitimate situation, in one case we could observe that the agreement between reported and implicit affects were higher, when the reactance was created illegitimate. In some cases the order of the test-instrument influenced the results. The personality dimension extraversion had no great impact on the agreement between reported and implicit affects. [...], GRIN Verlag<

2008, ISBN: 9783640176670

Seminar paper from the year 2008 in the subject Psychology - Cognition, grade: 2, University of Salzburg (Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät Universität Salzburg), course: Seminar Sozialpsyc… More...

Seminar paper from the year 2008 in the subject Psychology - Cognition, grade: 2, University of Salzburg (Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät Universität Salzburg), course: Seminar Sozialpsychologie, 15 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: In our present work we want to enter into the question how the agreement between reported and implicit affects will vary in different situation of freedom restriction, in different orders of test-methods and we ask how Eysencks personality construct Extraversion has an influence on the dissociation between reported and implicit affects. We also try to evaluate, if people report higher reactance, when they have experienced legitimate or illegitimate created reactance instead of experiences in a neutral situation. People in the legitimate situation didnt experience more explicit reactance than people in the illegitimate situations. People, who have experienced legitimate or illegitimate created reactance reported about higher reactance than people in the neutral situation. Compared with the legitimate situation, in one case we could observe that the agreement between reported and implicit affects were higher, when the reactance was created illegitimate. In some cases the order of the test-instrument influenced the results. The personality dimension extraversion had no great impact on the agreement between reported and implicit affects. [...] The agreement between explicit and implicit affects in legitimate and illegitimate situations eBook eBooks>Fremdsprachige eBooks>Englische eBooks>Sach- & Fachthemen>Psychologie, GRIN<

2008, ISBN: 9783640176670

In our present work we want to enter into the question how the agreement between reported and implicit affects will vary in different situation of freedom restriction, in different orders… More...

In our present work we want to enter into the question how the agreement between reported and implicit affects will vary in different situation of freedom restriction, in different orders of test-methods and we ask how Eysencks personality construct Extraversion has an influence on the dissociation between reported and implicit affects. We also try to evaluate, if people report higher reactance, when they have experienced legitimate or illegitimate created reactance instead of experiences in a neutral situation. People in the legitimate situation didnt experience more explicit reactance than people in the illegitimate situations. People, who have experienced legitimate or illegitimate created reactance reported about higher reactance than people in the neutral situation. Compared with the legitimate situation, in one case we could observe that the agreement between reported and implicit affects were higher, when the reactance was created illegitimate. In some cases the order of the test-instrument influenced the results. The personality dimension extraversion had no great impact on the agreement between reported and implicit affects. [...] Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2008 im Fachbereich Psychologie - Kognitive Psychologie, Note: 2, Universität Salzburg (Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät Universität Salzburg), Veranstaltung: Seminar Sozialpsychologie, 15 Quellen im Literaturverzeichnis, Sprache: Englisch eBook eBooks>Fremdsprachige eBooks>Englische eBooks>Sach- & Fachthemen>Psychologie, GRIN Verlag<

2008, ISBN: 9783640176670

In our present work we want to enter into the question how the agreement between reported and implicit affects will vary in different situation of freedom restriction, in different orders… More...

In our present work we want to enter into the question how the agreement between reported and implicit affects will vary in different situation of freedom restriction, in different orders of test-methods and we ask how Eysencks personality construct Extraversion has an influence on the dissociation between reported and implicit affects. We also try to evaluate, if people report higher reactance, when they have experienced legitimate or illegitimate created reactance instead of experiences in a neutral situation. People in the legitimate situation didnt experience more explicit reactance than people in the illegitimate situations. People, who have experienced legitimate or illegitimate created reactance reported about higher reactance than people in the neutral situation. Compared with the legitimate situation, in one case we could observe that the agreement between reported and implicit affects were higher, when the reactance was created illegitimate. In some cases the order of the test-instrument influenced the results. The personality dimension extraversion had no great impact on the agreement between reported and implicit affects. [...] Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2008 im Fachbereich Psychologie - Kognitive Psychologie, Note: 2, Universität Salzburg (Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät Universität Salzburg), Veranstaltung: Seminar Sozialpsychologie, 15 Quellen im Literaturverzeichnis, Sprache: Englisch eBook eBooks>Fremdsprachige eBooks>Englische eBooks>Sach- & Fachthemen>Psychologie, GRIN<

2008, ISBN: 9783640176670

[ED: 1], 1., Auflage, eBook Download (PDF), eBooks, [PU: GRIN Verlag]